Scene to read · Communication, Professionalism
Beyond the rubric
You are a student peer reviewer in a writing course, scoring Alfonse's draft using the instructor's rubric.
In a writing classroom during peer review, Alessia, the instructor's assistant, is checking in with you and Alfonse, whose draft you are reviewing. Comments must stay within the rubric. Alfonse has also asked you privately whether his draft is weak overall. You think it is.
The scene
Alessia: Remember, stay inside the rubric. Scores and criteria only, no verdicts.
Alfonse: I know the rules, Alessia. I'd rather hear truth than guess.
Alessia: The rubric keeps feedback fair and consistent for everyone in class.
Alfonse: Fair enough. Still, I'm counting on this reviewer for straight answers.
The two questions
- 1What would you do, and why?
- 2When, if ever, is it right to go beyond a set format in order to give someone honest feedback?
What raters look for
- Communication
- Listens first, speaks clearly and respectfully, and adapts the message to the listener.
- Professionalism
- Is reliable, respects boundaries and confidentiality, and holds a consistent standard under pressure.
Answer scenarios like this on the real timers
Answer both questions on the clock, and get each one scored 1–9 the way raters score. Your first set is free, no card.
Practice free
