You are a physician in a rural clinic. A 16-year-old patient seeks an abortion but begs you not to inform her parents, with whom she has a difficult relationship. How do you proceed, balancing patient confidentiality and family dynamics?

Where answers to this question lose points

Our scorer marks every answer on three parts. For each of the 64 applicants who finished this question on Confetto, we took their first scored answer and counted the part that scored lowest.

• Content: covering what the question needs22 of 64
• Structure: a clear order and a clear point21 of 64

Confetto data as of November 8, 2026. A part is shown only when 20 or more applicants share it. Answers where two parts tied are not counted toward either. We never show anyone's answers or details.

What this question tests

• Ethics
• Communication
• Patient care

How to structure your answer

1. Ask questions (25 seconds). The opening identifies the problem as keeping a vulnerable patient safe and supported while navigating confidentiality and legal requirements, rather than announcing a verdict. The answer then seeks current state requirements from reliable legal guidance and asks the patient what her difficult relationship with her parents involves.
2. Who is affected (20 seconds). The patient comes first, particularly her health, safety, trust, and risk of harm, rejection, or losing her home. Her parents and any trusted adult are also involved, while the physician must provide supportive care within legal boundaries.
3. The conflict (20 seconds). The conflict is between protecting the patient's confidentiality and autonomy and meeting any legal requirements for parental involvement. The answer also recognizes that family support could help her, but disclosure could expose her to harm rather than provide that support.
4. Options (40 seconds). The answer considers confidential care where legally permitted, involving a trusted adult where appropriate, or seeking counseling and legal advocacy if parental involvement is required. Confidential care may leave her without family support, adult involvement may risk unwanted disclosure, and legal routes may involve delays.
5. Choose (30 seconds). The answer chooses nonjudgmental, safety-focused care that protects confidentiality and autonomy as far as the law allows, rather than automatically contacting the parents. Its main reason is that preserving trust and understanding possible harm are central to protecting this patient's well-being.
6. What next (20 seconds). The next steps are to explain the legal requirements clearly, explore appropriate support, and connect her with counseling or legal advocacy when needed. The answer also ensures she has confidential hotlines and support resources regardless of her decision, although it does not explicitly describe follow-up or documentation.

Example answer from Confetto

Example answer from Confetto. Not a real applicant's answer.

My immediate concern is ensuring this young patient feels safe and supported while navigating the complex legal and ethical considerations at play. I recognize that she's come to me during an incredibly vulnerable time, and maintaining her trust is crucial for her well-being.

First, I need to understand the specific laws in my state regarding parental consent and notification for minors seeking abortion services. Many states have different requirements, and some provide exceptions for cases involving abuse or when involving parents might not be in the minor's best interest. I would also want to explore what she means by having a "difficult relationship" with her parents, as this could indicate potential safety concerns that would influence my approach.

I believe my primary responsibility is to this patient's health and safety. I would spend time listening to her concerns about involving her parents and try to understand whether there are legitimate fears of harm, rejection, or violence. If she's facing potential abuse or being kicked out of her home, that significantly changes how I proceed compared to typical family disagreements.

I would explain the legal requirements clearly while also discussing all her options, including the possibility of involving another trusted adult like a grandparent, aunt, or family friend who might serve as support. Some states allow for alternative adult involvement when parental notification isn't feasible.

If the law requires parental involvement and no exceptions apply, I would help connect her with resources like counseling services and potentially legal advocacy to explore her options. I would also ensure she knows about confidential hotlines and support services regardless of what she decides.

Throughout this process, I'm committed to providing non-judgmental medical care while working within legal boundaries to protect her safety and autonomy as much as possible.

Use it for its structure. Interviewers can tell a memorized script, so tell your own story.

Keep going

• You are a family physician. Your patient, Mark, missed an important exam and says his teacher will give him a zero unless he brings a doctor's note. He asks you to write that he was too unwell to write the exam, but you can't find anything wrong with him. Enter the room and talk to Mark.
• A patient with Down syndrome is pregnant and does not want an abortion. Her mother and her husband want her to have one. What should a physician do in this situation?
• A patient refuses a life-saving vaccination for their child based on personal beliefs. How do you balance the parents' autonomy with the child's well-being and public health concerns?
• Medical school interview questions by type
• The full interview question bank