EthicsAdvancedMMI station

A 9-year-old with measles begs you for the vaccine. The parents still refuse. Do you vaccinate?

Ethical dilemma: Competing duties with no perfect answer: consent, confidentiality, fairness.

Say it out loud

Confetto's AI interviewer asks you this question, follows up like a real interviewer and gives feedback on your answer.

Practice this question now

7-day free trial

Sample answer outline

  1. Spot the clinical detail: a child who already has measles won't be helped by the measles vaccine now. The priority is treating them, isolating them and protecting contacts.
  2. Explain the frame: a 9-year-old can't consent alone; parents decide unless their choice puts the child at serious risk.
  3. Explore the parents' reasons with respect and correct misinformation. The illness is a natural moment to revisit vaccines for the child's siblings and the child's other vaccines.
  4. Keep the child's voice in the room: acknowledge their fear and explain what will happen.
  5. Notify public health as required.

What makes it work

  • Catching the clinical premise shows careful reading, which interviewers love.
  • It respects parents while still protecting children and the public.

Avoid

  • Vaccinating against the parents' wishes without legal grounds.
  • Lecturing the parents.

How to approach ethical dilemma questions

  1. Clarify the facts and what you would want to know before acting.
  2. Name who is affected and the principles in tension: autonomy, doing good, avoiding harm, fairness, confidentiality.
  3. Walk through realistic options, starting with the least drastic.
  4. Choose a course of action, explain why, and say who you would involve.

Asked in

Related questions

Say it out loud

Confetto's AI interviewer asks you this question, follows up like a real interviewer and gives feedback on your answer.

Practice this question now

7-day free trial

All interview questions